{"response":{"docs":[{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-11-04T22:46:40Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-11-21T01:46:06Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000030467","accessControl_ssim":["4709d91f-c9c4-4fa3-88bc-7769ee688081"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["cj82kc13v"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["cj82kc13v"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["Evidence, policy and practice : developing a new shared evidence base for public health"],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-11-04T22:46:40Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-11-11T07:19:00Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["30467"],"abstract_tesim":["This discussion paper sets out the key points which have emerged from the King's Fund's participation in the public health evidence debate. It addresses four central issues: the need for change (how adequate is the existing public health evidence base?; what issues need to be addressed?; what are the consequences of leaving these unresolved?); the scope of the public health evidence base (how wide should the net be cast?; what information should the public health evidence base contain?; what gaps need to be filled, and what are the implications of leaving them unplugged?); values and hierarchies (how should the new public health evidence base be conceived?; are existing frameworks suitable for application to the field of public health?); and a new, shared framework (can a conceptually sound framework for evidence be developed and applied to the field of public health; what might the elements of such a framework be?)"],"date_published_tesim":["2000"],"date_published_ssi":"2000","pagination_tesim":["31"],"place_of_publication_tesim":["London"],"rights_statement_tesim":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"license_tesim":["http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"creator_tesim":["Gowman, Natasha","Coote, Anna","King's Fund"],"date_tesim":["2000"],"date_ssi":"2000","publisher_tesim":["King's Fund"],"resource_type_tesim":["Monograph"],"subject_tesim":["Evidence based practice","Public health"],"note_tesim":["Pagination: 31p.; Additional research for this paper was conducted by Hanif Ismail, who compiled the analysis of recommendations featured in Section Three. The discussion paper also draws on points made by participants at a King's Fund symposium 'Our Healthier Nation : evidence, policy and practice' held in June 1999 with support from the Department of Health."],"former_identifier_tesim":["30467"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/cj82kc13v?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["gf06g624f","s7526g82g","1n79h777z","df65vc79c","7w62fd140","sn00b2253","5m60qw73j","7p88cm20n","s1784q21g","08612s372","3b591d19x","dr26z1905","08612s38b","cj82kc13v","dv13zx83t","6969z464w","5425kf16v","0g354k05j","jm214s708","12579w911","c534fs598","w3763b20q","jq085p666","zg64tq50s","5m60qw74t","s1784q206","1g05fg40s","jw827g43b","cj82kc144","5712mb21z","8s45qd94b","mg74qq412","rx913t54g","sx61dq99g","wh246x04d","d217qs96t","cn69m795n","0z709140c","z890rz05d","1g05fg412","7h149t47b","qv33s144d","70795b934"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["gf06g624f","s7526g82g","1n79h777z","df65vc79c","7w62fd140","sn00b2253","5m60qw73j","7p88cm20n","s1784q21g","08612s372","3b591d19x","dr26z1905","08612s38b","cj82kc13v","dv13zx83t","6969z464w","5425kf16v","0g354k05j","jm214s708","12579w911","c534fs598","w3763b20q","jq085p666","zg64tq50s","5m60qw74t","s1784q206","1g05fg40s","jw827g43b","cj82kc144","5712mb21z","8s45qd94b","mg74qq412","rx913t54g","sx61dq99g","wh246x04d","d217qs96t","cn69m795n","0z709140c","z890rz05d","1g05fg412","7h149t47b","qv33s144d","70795b934"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000030467"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1717496847426125824,"timestamp":"2021-11-26T13:17:11.899Z","score":1.0},{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-10-27T22:26:23Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T14:42:55Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000023677","accessControl_ssim":["85a6cce9-9b7a-4003-bfcc-a2f067ac13a1"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["bv73c042m"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["bv73c042m"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["Evidence and public health : towards a common framework."],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-10-27T22:26:23Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:59:24Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["23677"],"abstract_tesim":["The need for a credible, accessible and conceptually sound evidence base for public health has never been more pressing. It is now widely acknowledged that improving health involves a range of different activities by many players on many fronts.  Government policy, set out in the White Paper, 'Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation', identifies specific targets for reducing avoidable deaths from cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke, accidents and suicides. It sets broader objectives for improving health and reducing health inequalities. It also stresses the importance of individuals, local communities and national government working together to achieve these goals. The government has emphasised its commitment to 'evidence-based policy-making' and wants to link public investment to knowledge of 'what works'. However, it is notoriously difficult to assess the effectiveness of many forms of public health activity, especially those relating to the underlying causes of health and ill health. Conventional approaches to evidence are insufficient and unhelpful. There is not enough evidence of the types required, and what does exist is too narrowly defined and biased towards a medical model of public health. A common approach, which all parties can endorse, is needed. a new shared framework is proposed, within which a more inclusive and appropriate evidence base can be built up over time.  [Summary]"],"date_published_tesim":["2000"],"date_published_ssi":"2000","official_url_tesim":["http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/evidence-and-public-health"],"pagination_tesim":["4p."],"place_of_publication_tesim":["London : King's Fund"],"creator_tesim":["King's Fund","Coote, Anna","Gowman, Natasha"],"date_tesim":["2000"],"date_ssi":"2000","subject_tesim":["Evidence based policy","Public health","Evidence based practice","Effectiveness"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/bv73c042m?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["bv73c042m"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["bv73c042m"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000023677"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1714882950260064256,"timestamp":"2021-10-28T16:50:25.306Z","score":1.0},{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-10-27T22:26:04Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T14:42:39Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000023676","accessControl_ssim":["12086fb8-9819-4906-9433-795acc8c6bf4"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["xd07gs68j"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["xd07gs68j"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["Evidence and public health : towards a common framework."],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-10-27T22:26:04Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:59:16Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["23676"],"abstract_tesim":["This document is available through the web only.","This discussion paper sets out the key points that have emerged from the King's Fund participation in the public health evidence debate. It addresses four central issues: the need for change (how adequate is the existing public health evidence base?, what issues need to be addressed?, what are the consequences of leaving these unresolved?); the scope of the public health evidence base (how wide should the net be cast?, what information should the public health evidence base contain?, what gaps need to be filled - and what are the implications of leaving them unplugged?); values and hierarchies (how should the new public health evidence base be conceived?, are existing frameworks suitable for application to the field of public health?); and towards a new shared framework (can a conceptually sound framework for evidence be developed and applied to the field of public health?, what might the elements of such a framework be?). The paper comments on specific points raised by the Health Education Authority's consultation paper 'Evidence Base 2000 : evidence into practice'. An open response to their proposals is set out in Section 1, and central issues raised in the reponse are explored in more detail in the discussion that follows in Section 2.  [Background and introduction amended]"],"date_published_tesim":["2000"],"date_published_ssi":"2000","official_url_tesim":["http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/evidence-and-public-health"],"pagination_tesim":["32p."],"place_of_publication_tesim":["London : King's Fund"],"creator_tesim":["King's Fund","Coote, Anna","Gowman, Natasha"],"date_tesim":["2000"],"date_ssi":"2000","subject_tesim":["Public health","Evidence based practice"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/xd07gs68j?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["xd07gs68j"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["xd07gs68j"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000023676"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1714882932659716096,"timestamp":"2021-10-28T16:50:08.521Z","score":1.0}],"facets":[{"name":"creator_sim","items":[{"value":"Coote, Anna","hits":3,"label":"Coote, Anna"},{"value":"Gowman, Natasha","hits":3,"label":"Gowman, Natasha"},{"value":"King's Fund","hits":3,"label":"King's Fund"}],"label":"Author"},{"name":"subject_sim","items":[{"value":"Evidence based practice","hits":3,"label":"Evidence based practice"},{"value":"Public health","hits":3,"label":"Public health"},{"value":"Effectiveness","hits":1,"label":"Effectiveness"},{"value":"Evidence based policy","hits":1,"label":"Evidence based policy"}],"label":"Subject"},{"name":"resource_type_sim","items":[{"value":"Monograph","hits":1,"label":"Monograph"}],"label":"Resource type"},{"name":"date_range_sim","items":[{"value":"2000","hits":3,"label":"2000"}],"label":"Date Range"},{"name":"file_format_sim","items":[],"label":"File format"},{"name":"member_of_collections_ssim","items":[],"label":"Collection"},{"name":"generic_type_sim","items":[{"value":"Work","hits":3,"label":"Work"}],"label":"Generic Type Sim"}],"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":null,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":1,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":0,"total_count":3,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":true}}}