{"response":{"docs":[{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-10-27T21:42:56Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T14:17:11Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000099346","accessControl_ssim":["6840e493-74c6-499f-bd47-374ef41a9190"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["47429913s"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["47429913s"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["Accountability in the NHS : implications of the government's reform programme."],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-10-27T21:42:56Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:44:11Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["99346"],"abstract_tesim":["The government’s health reforms propose radical changes to the structures and processes within the National Health Service (NHS) in England that have provoked unprecedented debate, protest and opposition. One of the core issues is how providers and commissioners of care will be held to account in the future if many of the existing lines of accountability are removed, and there are deep concerns about whether the proposed substitutes are adequate for the task. The reforms could significantly reduce the day-to-day involvement of politicians, civil servants and managers in health care. Localisation, GP empowerment and patient choices will be the new priorities. Accountability in the NHS: Implications of the government’s health reform programme seeks to inform the debate around the nature of accountability relationships in the NHS and how these will change under the reforms. The authors identify five types of accountability most relevant to health care – by scrutiny, management, regulation, contract and election. Current accountability relationships, of both providers and commissioners, are considered and these are compared and contrasted with the proposed new forms. The authors then assess whether the reforms will meet the government’s policy aims and whether the new system is workable. The report concludes that the proposals carry significant implications for: secondary care providers, whose accountability will shift to see a greater reliance on regulation and internal governance, GP practices as providers, who will see an increase in accountability requirements, GP commissioners, who may face managerial and political accountability requirements, with the NHS Commissioning Board having potentially wide-ranging powers of intervention in relation to consortia. There is a real risk that the accountability of secondary care providers will be underpowered in the new system. The authors contend that this may be politically unacceptable in the medium to long term. Overall, they raise concerns about a shift towards a reliance on local accountability mechanisms that are, as yet, unproven."],"date_published_tesim":["2011"],"date_published_ssi":"2011","official_url_tesim":["http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/document.rm?id=9144"],"place_of_publication_tesim":["London"],"creator_tesim":["Addicott, Rachael","Maybin, Jo","Dixon, Anna"],"date_tesim":["2011"],"date_ssi":"2011","publisher_tesim":["King's Fund"],"subject_tesim":["evaluation","governance","accountability","NHS Commissioning Board","NHS reforms","public participation"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/47429913s?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["47429913s"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["47429913s"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000099346"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1714881012274561024,"timestamp":"2021-10-28T16:19:37.099Z","score":1.0},{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-10-27T20:48:48Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:32:35Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000040008","accessControl_ssim":["8f5b8f9a-3a8d-4455-a265-35966e11f87f"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["6108vb24b"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["6108vb24b"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["Background to the next stage review."],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-10-27T20:48:48Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:26:22Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["40008"],"abstract_tesim":["In July 2007 Professor Lord Ara Darzi, a surgeon and health minister, started a wide-ranging review of the NHS in England and the final report is due to be published before the 60th anniversary of the NHS on 5 July 2008. This briefing provides the background of the review and previews the recommendations the report will make.  [Introduction]"],"date_published_tesim":["2008"],"date_published_ssi":"2008","official_url_tesim":["http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/background-lord-darzi-nhs-next-stage-review-kings-fund-june-2008_0.pdf"],"pagination_tesim":["13p."],"creator_tesim":["King's Fund","Maybin, Jo"],"date_tesim":["2008"],"date_ssi":"2008","publisher_tesim":["London : King's Fund"],"subject_tesim":["Change management","NHS reforms","NHS reorganisation"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/6108vb24b?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["6108vb24b"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["6108vb24b"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000040008"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1714877082846101504,"timestamp":"2021-10-28T15:17:09.704Z","score":1.0},{"system_create_dtsi":"2021-10-27T20:41:43Z","system_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:27:41Z","has_model_ssim":["PublishedWork"],"id":"000093815","accessControl_ssim":["a4d255cd-4f47-4c19-b95b-ed4648cea3c7"],"hasRelatedMediaFragment_ssim":["xg94hp52v"],"hasRelatedImage_ssim":["xg94hp52v"],"depositor_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"depositor_tesim":["batchuser@example.com"],"title_tesim":["A high-performing NHS? : a review of progress 1997-2010."],"date_uploaded_dtsi":"2021-10-27T20:41:43Z","date_modified_dtsi":"2021-10-28T13:24:23Z","isPartOf_ssim":["admin_set/default"],"biblionumber_tesim":["93815"],"abstract_tesim":["This review assesses how far the investment and accompanying reforms since 1997 have transformed the NHS in England into a high-performing health system.  The review focuses on England because health policy has now diverged from that in the devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.  It has drawn on official data, government and other official reports and academic research to assess how much progress the NHS has made in eight domains since 1997.  The review asks whether the NHS is: accessible; safe; promoting health and managing long-term conditions; clinically effective; delivering a positive patient experience; equitable; efficient and accountable."],"date_published_tesim":["2010"],"date_published_ssi":"2010","official_url_tesim":["http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/high-performing-nhs"],"pagination_tesim":["viii, 142p."],"place_of_publication_tesim":["London"],"creator_tesim":["The King's Fund","Maybin, Jo","Thorlby, Ruth"],"date_tesim":["2010"],"date_ssi":"2010","publisher_tesim":["The King's Fund"],"subject_tesim":["equity","patient experience","chronic disease","accountability","patient safety","NHS reforms","government policy","patient waiting time","efficiency","clinical effectiveness"],"thumbnail_path_ss":"/downloads/xg94hp52v?file=thumbnail","suppressed_bsi":false,"actionable_workflow_roles_ssim":["admin_set/default-default-managing","admin_set/default-default-approving","admin_set/default-default-depositing"],"workflow_state_name_ssim":["deposited"],"member_ids_ssim":["xg94hp52v"],"file_set_ids_ssim":["xg94hp52v"],"visibility_ssi":"open","admin_set_tesim":["Default Admin Set"],"human_readable_type_tesim":["Published Work"],"read_access_group_ssim":["public"],"edit_access_group_ssim":["admin"],"edit_access_person_ssim":["batchuser@example.com"],"nesting_collection__pathnames_ssim":["000093815"],"nesting_collection__deepest_nested_depth_isi":1,"_version_":1714874481931976704,"timestamp":"2021-10-28T14:35:49.279Z","score":1.0}],"facets":[{"name":"creator_sim","items":[{"value":"Maybin, Jo","hits":3,"label":"Maybin, Jo"},{"value":"Addicott, Rachael","hits":1,"label":"Addicott, Rachael"},{"value":"Dixon, Anna","hits":1,"label":"Dixon, Anna"},{"value":"King's Fund","hits":1,"label":"King's Fund"},{"value":"The King's Fund","hits":1,"label":"The King's Fund"},{"value":"Thorlby, Ruth","hits":1,"label":"Thorlby, Ruth"}],"label":"Author"},{"name":"subject_sim","items":[{"value":"NHS reforms","hits":3,"label":"NHS reforms"},{"value":"accountability","hits":2,"label":"accountability"},{"value":"Change management","hits":1,"label":"Change management"},{"value":"NHS Commissioning Board","hits":1,"label":"NHS Commissioning Board"},{"value":"NHS reorganisation","hits":1,"label":"NHS reorganisation"},{"value":"chronic disease","hits":1,"label":"chronic disease"}],"label":"Subject"},{"name":"resource_type_sim","items":[],"label":"Resource type"},{"name":"date_range_sim","items":[{"value":"2008","hits":1,"label":"2008"},{"value":"2010","hits":1,"label":"2010"},{"value":"2011","hits":1,"label":"2011"}],"label":"Date Range"},{"name":"file_format_sim","items":[],"label":"File format"},{"name":"member_of_collections_ssim","items":[],"label":"Collection"},{"name":"generic_type_sim","items":[{"value":"Work","hits":3,"label":"Work"}],"label":"Generic Type Sim"}],"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":null,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":1,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":0,"total_count":3,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":true}}}